##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Fernando Vega Villasante a:1:{s:5:"es_ES";s:26:"Universidad de Guadalajara";}
Blanca Soro Mateo Centro de Estudios en Bioderecho, Ética y Salud. Universidad de Murcia. Spain.
Martín A. Aréchiga-Palomera Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de la Costa, Laboratorio de Calidad de Agua y Acuicultura Experimental.
Olimpia Chong-Carrillo Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de la Costa, Laboratorio de Calidad de Agua y Acuicultura Experimental.

Keywords

Array

Resumen

Objective: To analyze the differences between the regulatory frameworks of the European Union and Mexico in terms of aquatic animal protection and welfare, in order to propose improvements in Mexican legislation.


Design/methodology/approach: Comparative study of legislative frameworks, the European Union regulatory framework on animal welfare, the current situation of Mexican regulations and the identification of gaps and areas of opportunity.


Results: The European Union has a comprehensive legislative framework that includes the regulation of animal husbandry, animal experimentation and transport, as well as aquatic organisms. Mexico has significant deficiencies, i.e., the absence of a General Animal Welfare Law and a clear lack of specific regulation for aquatic animals.


Limitations on study/implications: There is no general animal welfare law for Mexico; therefore, improvements are proposed in consideration of the European Union's regulatory framework.


Findings/conclusions:

Abstract | EARLY ACCESS 21 Downloads

Referencias

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a