Main Article Content

Saraí Barajas-Tejeda Colegio de Postgraduados, Posgrado en innovación en manejo de Recursos Naturales, Campus San Luis Potosí
Mercedes A. Jiménez-Velázquez Desarrollo Rural, Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo
Alejandra Olivera-Méndez Colegio de Postgraduados, Posgrado en innovación en manejo de Recursos Naturales, Campus San Luis Potosí
Tomás Martínez-Saldaña Desarrollo Rural, Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo
Margarita Torres-Aquino a:1:{s:5:"es_ES";s:24:"Colegio de Postgraduados";}

Keywords

Array

Abstract

Objective:


To understand how small producers perceive their agroforestry production unit (UPAF) from a social, economic, environmental, and technical context.


Design/methodology/approach:


A non-experimental qualitative analysis of the UPAF was performed. The information was collected through semi-structured interviews, participatory direct observation, and a field diary. The information was analyzed through codification, categorization, and the development of comparative and descriptive tables between the two municipalities and among the peasant families.


Results:


The UPAF provide socioeconomic, environmental, and technical-productive benefits to the producers who adopted and adapted the agroforestry system. Two factors influenced the adoption of the technology: age and technical monitoring.


Limitations on study/implications:


The main limitation of the present study was the small number of agroforestry production units and the specificity of the project, which restricts the generalization of results.


Findings/conclusions:


Agroforestry production units are consistent with the peasant economy, because they meet several of its characteristics: family productive unit, partial mercantile nature, undivided family work, way of playing with risk and belonging to a group. Therefore, these types of agroecological alternatives are viable for farmers.

Abstract | EARLY ACCESS 14 (Spanish) Downloads

References

Most read articles by the same author(s)